eson/googletest
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #2324 from kuzkry/fix-broken-link

Browse Source 
Fix a broken link
This commit is contained in:
Gennadiy Civil 2019-07-15 15:46:09 -04:00 committed by GitHub
commit afa9143256
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
googlemock/docs/cook_book.md
View File

@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ If a mock method has no `EXPECT_CALL` spec but is called, Google Mock
will print a warning about the "uninteresting call". The rationale is:
* New methods may be added to an interface after a test is written. We shouldn't fail a test just because a method it doesn't know about is called.
* However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. (Note that the user should [*not* add an `EXPECT_CALL()`](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#knowing-when-to-expect) to suppress the warning, even if they think the call is harmless).
* However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. (Note that the user should [*not* add an `EXPECT_CALL()`](https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/cook_book.md#knowing-when-to-expect) to suppress the warning, even if they think the call is harmless).
However, sometimes you may want to suppress all "uninteresting call"
warnings, while sometimes you may want the opposite, i.e. to treat all