Merge pull request #2341 from ChrisBaish:master
PiperOrigin-RevId: 261344735
This commit is contained in:
commit
6c7a8bec8d
|
@ -221,18 +221,16 @@ as `ASSERT_EQ(expected, actual)`, so lots of existing code uses this order. Now
|
|||
The assertions in this group compare two **C strings**. If you want to compare
|
||||
two `string` objects, use `EXPECT_EQ`, `EXPECT_NE`, and etc instead.
|
||||
|
||||
| Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies |
|
||||
| ----------------------- | ----------------------- | ---------------------- |
|
||||
| `ASSERT_STREQ(str1, | `EXPECT_STREQ(str1, | the two C strings have |
|
||||
: str2);` : str2);` : the same content :
|
||||
| `ASSERT_STRNE(str1, | `EXPECT_STRNE(str1, | the two C strings have |
|
||||
: str2);` : str2);` : different contents :
|
||||
| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(str1, | `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(str1, | the two C strings have |
|
||||
: str2);` : str2);` : the same content, :
|
||||
: : : ignoring case :
|
||||
| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(str1, | `EXPECT_STRCASENE(str1, | the two C strings have |
|
||||
: str2);` : str2);` : different contents, :
|
||||
: : : ignoring case :
|
||||
<!-- mdformat off(github rendering does not support multiline tables) -->
|
||||
|
||||
| Fatal assertion | Nonfatal assertion | Verifies |
|
||||
| -------------------------- | ------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| `ASSERT_STREQ(str1,str2);` | `EXPECT_STREQ(str1,str2);` | the two C strings have the same content |
|
||||
| `ASSERT_STRNE(str1,str2);` | `EXPECT_STRNE(str1,str2);` | the two C strings have different contents |
|
||||
| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(str1,str2);` | `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(str1,str2);` | the two C strings have the same content, ignoring case |
|
||||
| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(str1,str2);` | `EXPECT_STRCASENE(str1,str2);` | the two C strings have different contents, ignoring case |
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- mdformat on-->
|
||||
|
||||
Note that "CASE" in an assertion name means that case is ignored. A `NULL`
|
||||
pointer and an empty string are considered *different*.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user