Merge pull request #1719 from happyCoder92/master
docs: fix broken links
This commit is contained in:
		
						commit
						ad1c3931e2
					
				@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## Introduction
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Now that you have read the [googletest Primer](primer) and learned how to write
 | 
			
		||||
Now that you have read the [googletest Primer](primer.md) and learned how to write
 | 
			
		||||
tests using googletest, it's time to learn some new tricks. This document will
 | 
			
		||||
show you more assertions as well as how to construct complex failure messages,
 | 
			
		||||
propagate fatal failures, reuse and speed up your test fixtures, and use various
 | 
			
		||||
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ c is 10
 | 
			
		||||
>
 | 
			
		||||
> 1.  If you see a compiler error "no matching function to call" when using
 | 
			
		||||
>     `ASSERT_PRED*` or `EXPECT_PRED*`, please see
 | 
			
		||||
>     [this](faq#OverloadedPredicate) for how to resolve it.
 | 
			
		||||
>     [this](faq.md#OverloadedPredicate) for how to resolve it.
 | 
			
		||||
> 1.  Currently we only provide predicate assertions of arity <= 5. If you need
 | 
			
		||||
>     a higher-arity assertion, let [us](https://github.com/google/googletest/issues) know.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
@ -707,8 +707,9 @@ In general, the recommended way to cause the code to behave differently under
 | 
			
		||||
test is [Dependency Injection](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_injection). You can inject
 | 
			
		||||
different functionality from the test and from the production code. Since your
 | 
			
		||||
production code doesn't link in the for-test logic at all (the
 | 
			
		||||
[`testonly`](http://go/testonly) attribute for BUILD targets helps to ensure
 | 
			
		||||
that), there is no danger in accidentally running it.
 | 
			
		||||
[`testonly`](https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/be/common-definitions.html#common.testonly)
 | 
			
		||||
attribute for BUILD targets helps to ensure that), there is no danger in
 | 
			
		||||
accidentally running it.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
However, if you *really*, *really*, *really* have no choice, and if you follow
 | 
			
		||||
the rule of ending your test program names with `_test`, you can use the
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user