eson/googletest
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Replace "…" with "..."(three dots) to fix warning C4819 in Visual Studio

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
杜修杏 2018-07-20 06:15:13 +08:00
parent 20f9427c4a
commit 617d1fd14a
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
googlemock/docs/CookBook.md
View File

@ -2247,7 +2247,7 @@ enum class AccessLevel { kInternal, kPublic };
class Buzz {
public:
explicit Buzz(AccessLevel access) { … }
explicit Buzz(AccessLevel access) { ... }
...
};
@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ Note that `ByMove()` is essential here - if you drop it, the code won’t compil
Quiz time! What do you think will happen if a `Return(ByMove(...))` action is
performed more than once (e.g. you write
`….WillRepeatedly(Return(ByMove(...)));`)? Come think of it, after the first
`.WillRepeatedly(Return(ByMove(...)));`)? Come think of it, after the first
time the action runs, the source value will be consumed (since it’s a move-only
value), so the next time around, there’s no value to move from -- you’ll get a
run-time error that `Return(ByMove(...))` can only be run once.

4
googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-function-mockers.h.pump
View File

@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ class FunctionMocker<R($As)> : public
//
// class MockClass {
// // Overload 1
// MockSpec<string&()> gmock_GetName() { … }
// MockSpec<string&()> gmock_GetName() { ... }
// // Overload 2. Declared const so that the compiler will generate an
// // error when trying to resolve between this and overload 4 in
// // 'gmock_GetName(WithoutMatchers(), nullptr)'.
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ class FunctionMocker<R($As)> : public
// }
//
// // Overload 3
// const string& gmock_GetName() const { … }
// const string& gmock_GetName() const { ... }
// // Overload 4
// MockSpec<const string&()> gmock_GetName(
// const WithoutMatchers&, const Function<const string&()>*) const {