From 38ec2a1df69fe577a4131b55f9796cabaeb6a9db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jose Nino Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:27:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] docs: fix broken link from dummies guide to cook book --- googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md b/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md index 0da4cbe2..c6c0464a 100644 --- a/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md +++ b/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ By creating an object of type `InSequence`, all expectations in its scope are pu In this example, we test that `Foo()` calls the three expected functions in the order as written. If a call is made out-of-order, it will be an error. -(What if you care about the relative order of some of the calls, but not all of them? Can you specify an arbitrary partial order? The answer is ... yes! If you are impatient, the details can be found in the [CookBook](CookBook#Expecting_Partially_Ordered_Calls.md).) +(What if you care about the relative order of some of the calls, but not all of them? Can you specify an arbitrary partial order? The answer is ... yes! If you are impatient, the details can be found in the [CookBook](CookBook#expecting-partially-ordered-calls.md).) ## All Expectations Are Sticky (Unless Said Otherwise) ## Now let's do a quick quiz to see how well you can use this mock stuff already. How would you test that the turtle is asked to go to the origin _exactly twice_ (you want to ignore any other instructions it receives)?