Googletest export

- 277898422 BEGIN_PUBLIC by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>

PiperOrigin-RevId: 277898422
This commit is contained in:
Abseil Team
2019-11-01 06:28:59 -04:00
committed by Gennadiy Civil
parent c27acebba3
commit 0f0634a66e
15 changed files with 61 additions and 145 deletions

View File

@@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ Version: @PROJECT_VERSION@
URL: https://github.com/google/googletest
Requires: gtest
Libs: -L${libdir} -lgmock @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@
Cflags: -I${includedir} @GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO@
Cflags: -I${includedir} @GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO@ @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@

View File

@@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ Version: @PROJECT_VERSION@
URL: https://github.com/google/googletest
Requires: gmock
Libs: -L${libdir} -lgmock_main @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@
Cflags: -I${includedir} @GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO@
Cflags: -I${includedir} @GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD_MACRO@ @CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT@

View File

@@ -6,15 +6,18 @@ Template and macro libraries often need to define many classes, functions, or
macros that vary only (or almost only) in the number of arguments they take.
It's a lot of repetitive, mechanical, and error-prone work.
Our experience is that it's tedious to write custom scripts, which tend to
reflect the structure of the generated code poorly and are often hard to read
and edit. For example, a small change needed in the generated code may require
some non-intuitive, non-trivial changes in the script. This is especially
painful when experimenting with the code.
Variadic templates and variadic macros can alleviate the problem. However, while
both are being considered by the C++ committee, neither is in the standard yet
or widely supported by compilers. Thus they are often not a good choice,
especially when your code needs to be portable. And their capabilities are still
limited.
This script may be useful for generating meta code, for example a series of
macros of FOO1, FOO2, etc. Nevertheless, please make it your last resort
technique by favouring C++ template metaprogramming or variadic macros.
As a result, authors of such libraries often have to write scripts to generate
their implementation. However, our experience is that it's tedious to write such
scripts, which tend to reflect the structure of the generated code poorly and
are often hard to read and edit. For example, a small change needed in the
generated code may require some non-intuitive, non-trivial changes in the
script. This is especially painful when experimenting with the code.
# Our Solution

View File

@@ -58,17 +58,16 @@ using identity_t = T;
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_MOCK_METHOD_ARG_3(_Ret, _MethodName, _Args) \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_MOCK_METHOD_ARG_4(_Ret, _MethodName, _Args, ())
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_MOCK_METHOD_ARG_4(_Ret, _MethodName, _Args, _Spec) \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_ASSERT_PARENTHESIS(_Args); \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_ASSERT_PARENTHESIS(_Spec); \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_ASSERT_VALID_SIGNATURE( \
GMOCK_PP_NARG0 _Args, GMOCK_INTERNAL_SIGNATURE(_Ret, _Args)); \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_ASSERT_VALID_SPEC(_Spec) \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_MOCK_METHOD_IMPL( \
GMOCK_PP_NARG0 _Args, _MethodName, GMOCK_INTERNAL_HAS_CONST(_Spec), \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_HAS_OVERRIDE(_Spec), GMOCK_INTERNAL_HAS_FINAL(_Spec), \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_GET_NOEXCEPT_SPEC(_Spec), \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_GET_CALLTYPE(_Spec), \
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_MOCK_METHOD_ARG_4(_Ret, _MethodName, _Args, _Spec) \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_ASSERT_PARENTHESIS(_Args); \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_ASSERT_PARENTHESIS(_Spec); \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_ASSERT_VALID_SIGNATURE( \
GMOCK_PP_NARG0 _Args, GMOCK_INTERNAL_SIGNATURE(_Ret, _Args)); \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_ASSERT_VALID_SPEC(_Spec) \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_MOCK_METHOD_IMPL( \
GMOCK_PP_NARG0 _Args, _MethodName, GMOCK_INTERNAL_HAS_CONST(_Spec), \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_HAS_OVERRIDE(_Spec), GMOCK_INTERNAL_HAS_FINAL(_Spec), \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_HAS_NOEXCEPT(_Spec), GMOCK_INTERNAL_GET_CALLTYPE(_Spec), \
(GMOCK_INTERNAL_SIGNATURE(_Ret, _Args)))
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_MOCK_METHOD_ARG_5(...) \
@@ -108,14 +107,15 @@ using identity_t = T;
GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(GMOCK_INTERNAL_ASSERT_VALID_SPEC_ELEMENT, ~, _Spec)
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_MOCK_METHOD_IMPL(_N, _MethodName, _Constness, \
_Override, _Final, _NoexceptSpec, \
_Override, _Final, _Noexcept, \
_CallType, _Signature) \
typename ::testing::internal::Function<GMOCK_PP_REMOVE_PARENS( \
_Signature)>::Result \
GMOCK_INTERNAL_EXPAND(_CallType) \
_MethodName(GMOCK_PP_REPEAT(GMOCK_INTERNAL_PARAMETER, _Signature, _N)) \
GMOCK_PP_IF(_Constness, const, ) _NoexceptSpec \
GMOCK_PP_IF(_Override, override, ) GMOCK_PP_IF(_Final, final, ) { \
GMOCK_PP_IF(_Constness, const, ) GMOCK_PP_IF(_Noexcept, noexcept, ) \
GMOCK_PP_IF(_Override, override, ) \
GMOCK_PP_IF(_Final, final, ) { \
GMOCK_MOCKER_(_N, _Constness, _MethodName) \
.SetOwnerAndName(this, #_MethodName); \
return GMOCK_MOCKER_(_N, _Constness, _MethodName) \
@@ -131,7 +131,8 @@ using identity_t = T;
::testing::MockSpec<GMOCK_PP_REMOVE_PARENS(_Signature)> gmock_##_MethodName( \
const ::testing::internal::WithoutMatchers&, \
GMOCK_PP_IF(_Constness, const, )::testing::internal::Function< \
GMOCK_PP_REMOVE_PARENS(_Signature)>*) const _NoexceptSpec { \
GMOCK_PP_REMOVE_PARENS(_Signature)>*) \
const GMOCK_PP_IF(_Noexcept, noexcept, ) { \
return GMOCK_PP_CAT(::testing::internal::AdjustConstness_, \
GMOCK_PP_IF(_Constness, const, ))(this) \
->gmock_##_MethodName(GMOCK_PP_REPEAT( \
@@ -153,13 +154,9 @@ using identity_t = T;
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_HAS_FINAL(_Tuple) \
GMOCK_PP_HAS_COMMA(GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(GMOCK_INTERNAL_DETECT_FINAL, ~, _Tuple))
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_GET_NOEXCEPT_SPEC(_Tuple) \
GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(GMOCK_INTERNAL_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_IF_NOEXCEPT, ~, _Tuple)
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_IF_NOEXCEPT(_i, _, _elem) \
GMOCK_PP_IF( \
GMOCK_PP_HAS_COMMA(GMOCK_INTERNAL_DETECT_NOEXCEPT(_i, _, _elem)), \
_elem, )
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_HAS_NOEXCEPT(_Tuple) \
GMOCK_PP_HAS_COMMA( \
GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(GMOCK_INTERNAL_DETECT_NOEXCEPT, ~, _Tuple))
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_GET_CALLTYPE(_Tuple) \
GMOCK_PP_FOR_EACH(GMOCK_INTERNAL_GET_CALLTYPE_IMPL, ~, _Tuple)
@@ -190,6 +187,7 @@ using identity_t = T;
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_DETECT_FINAL_I_final ,
// TODO(iserna): Maybe noexcept should accept an argument here as well.
#define GMOCK_INTERNAL_DETECT_NOEXCEPT(_i, _, _elem) \
GMOCK_PP_CAT(GMOCK_INTERNAL_DETECT_NOEXCEPT_I_, _elem)

View File

@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ class PredicateFormatterFromMatcher {
<< "Expected: ";
matcher.DescribeTo(&ss);
// Rerun the matcher to "PrintAndExplain" the failure.
// Rerun the matcher to "PrintAndExain" the failure.
StringMatchResultListener listener;
if (MatchPrintAndExplain(x, matcher, &listener)) {
ss << "\n The matcher failed on the initial attempt; but passed when "

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
#!/usr/bin/env python2.7
#
# Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
# All rights reserved.
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ GRAMMAR:
from __future__ import print_function
import io
import os
import re
import sys
@@ -835,7 +834,7 @@ def main(argv):
sys.exit(1)
file_path = argv[-1]
output_str = ConvertFromPumpSource(io.open(file_path, 'r').read())
output_str = ConvertFromPumpSource(file(file_path, 'r').read())
if file_path.endswith('.pump'):
output_file_path = file_path[:-5]
else:
@@ -843,11 +842,11 @@ def main(argv):
if output_file_path == '-':
print(output_str,)
else:
output_file = io.open(output_file_path, 'w')
output_file.write(u'// This file was GENERATED by command:\n')
output_file.write(u'// %s %s\n' %
output_file = file(output_file_path, 'w')
output_file.write('// This file was GENERATED by command:\n')
output_file.write('// %s %s\n' %
(os.path.basename(__file__), os.path.basename(file_path)))
output_file.write(u'// DO NOT EDIT BY HAND!!!\n\n')
output_file.write('// DO NOT EDIT BY HAND!!!\n\n')
output_file.write(output_str)
output_file.close()

View File

@@ -42,8 +42,6 @@
#include <map>
#include <string>
#include <type_traits>
#include "gmock/gmock.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
@@ -665,32 +663,5 @@ TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, MockMethodSizeOverhead) {
EXPECT_EQ(sizeof(MockMethodSizes0), sizeof(MockMethodSizes4));
}
void hasTwoParams(int, int);
void MaybeThrows();
void DoesntThrow() noexcept;
struct MockMethodNoexceptSpecifier {
MOCK_METHOD(void, func1, (), (noexcept));
MOCK_METHOD(void, func2, (), (noexcept(true)));
MOCK_METHOD(void, func3, (), (noexcept(false)));
MOCK_METHOD(void, func4, (), (noexcept(noexcept(MaybeThrows()))));
MOCK_METHOD(void, func5, (), (noexcept(noexcept(DoesntThrow()))));
MOCK_METHOD(void, func6, (), (noexcept(noexcept(DoesntThrow())), const));
MOCK_METHOD(void, func7, (), (const, noexcept(noexcept(DoesntThrow()))));
// Put commas in the noexcept expression
MOCK_METHOD(void, func8, (), (noexcept(noexcept(hasTwoParams(1, 2))), const));
};
TEST(MockMethodMockFunctionTest, NoexceptSpecifierPreserved) {
EXPECT_TRUE(noexcept(std::declval<MockMethodNoexceptSpecifier>().func1()));
EXPECT_TRUE(noexcept(std::declval<MockMethodNoexceptSpecifier>().func2()));
EXPECT_FALSE(noexcept(std::declval<MockMethodNoexceptSpecifier>().func3()));
EXPECT_FALSE(noexcept(std::declval<MockMethodNoexceptSpecifier>().func4()));
EXPECT_TRUE(noexcept(std::declval<MockMethodNoexceptSpecifier>().func5()));
EXPECT_TRUE(noexcept(std::declval<MockMethodNoexceptSpecifier>().func6()));
EXPECT_TRUE(noexcept(std::declval<MockMethodNoexceptSpecifier>().func7()));
EXPECT_EQ(noexcept(std::declval<MockMethodNoexceptSpecifier>().func8()),
noexcept(hasTwoParams(1, 2)));
}
} // namespace gmock_function_mocker_test
} // namespace testing